Cases 21 - 30 of 1,128
Peterson v. Seibold et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
John Peterson, III
Defendant:
LT. S. Seibold, Msgt. T. Warner and Sgt. A. Ligon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kearney v. Mangrum et al
as 2:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Lerico Kearney
Defendant:
Mangrum and Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00671
Petitioner:
Mauricio Warner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Warner v. Racine County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Kyle Warner
Defendant:
Racine County Jail, Racine County Jail Medical Staff and Racine County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
DeLarron Keith Washington
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jimmy Coleman, IV, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ademeko Maclin-Carney v. Ashley Warner, et al
as 24-1110
Plaintiff:
ADEMEKO MACLIN-CARNEY
Defendant:
ASHLEY WARNER, MICHELLE STINE, WENDY DIERECKS and others
Sayidin v. Warner
as 2:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Mahamad Hussein Sayidin
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Andy Gonzalez
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Nanette Warner, Cecilia Benabidez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Webb, Jr. v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH WEBB, JR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, RENEE HRIVNAK, Deputy Attorney General for Department of Justice and others
(PC) Van Huisen v. Warner Brothers et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
Warner Brothers and Leonardo DiCaprio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
