Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Jones v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv00367
Defendant:
Sgt T. McKamey, Sgt. J. Smith, Dep D Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv01226
Defendant:
Lee, Montefusco, Steven Stebbins and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alexis Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Toth et al
as 6:2018cv01979
Respondent:
Unknown Richland Co Ct HO, NFN Hall, Ms Toth and others
Petitioner:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
EARLEY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00910
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY and ROBERT GILMORE
Petitioner:
HENRY NOAH EARLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garrett v. Stirling et al
as 0:2018cv01309
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Garrett, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Bernard McKie, Franklin Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Dennis et al
as 2:2018cv01011
Plaintiff:
Albert Santanieyo Kelley
Defendant:
Paul Dennis, Beverly Woods, Associate Warden Earley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins v. Mollhoff et al
as 0:2018cv00343
Plaintiff:
Earley Blevins
Defendant:
Peter Mollhoff, Brandon Mariakis, Micheal Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earley #113115 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03358
Plaintiff:
Roy Charles Earley
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Gerald Thompson, Arizona State Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earley #113115 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01265
Petitioner:
Roy Charles Earley
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Gerald Thompson and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Arnold v. Brad Smith, et al
as 17-15218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD L. ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD SMITH, PHILLIP EARLEY, GARY LOREDO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
