Cases 41 - 50 of 3,005
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. McCradic
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Alex Cole
Defendant:
Tyran McCradic and Darrell Elkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Binns v. Coles et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Gregory Binns
Defendant:
SGT. Coles, LT. Riggsby, K9 Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney, Angel Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant:
T.A. WEAVIL, DANNY ROGERS, VERONICA L. EDMINSTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, ANDREW COLE, SCHEPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ezell v. Cole, et al
as 24-6025
Plaintiff:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant:
DAVID COLE, Warden GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU RUSSELL, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU COOPER, L/T, Ms., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual capacity and others
Cole v. Hooper
as 24-30095
Petitioner:
Bryan Cole
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
