Cases 41 - 50 of 1,607
Johns v. USA
as 4:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Josh Johns
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tuffli v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jarl Tuffli
Defendant:
State of Oregon, ODOC, Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Warnecke
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Nichols
Defendant:
John Michael Warnecke, Mathew Ellis, Adam Rummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Josh Pompey v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1048
Plaintiff:
JOSH POMPEY
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Tyrone Scott v. Wayne Holdon, Jr., et al
as 24-1039
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Scott
Defendant:
Wayne Holdon, Jr., DEA, Officer, Miller County Detention Center, Rick Dodd, Retired DEA, Wayne Holding Co. and others
Holbrook v. Hurlbert et al
as 7:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dwayne Holbrook
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Southwest Virginia Regional Jail, Charles Hurlbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mary v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Sharon Mary
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Hamby et al
as 1:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
Josh Hamby and Big Spring Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lungaho v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Mujera Benjamin Lungaho
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Dane Barnum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
