Cases 51 - 60 of 6,250
Chafin v. Caudill et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chafin
Defendant:
Steve Caudill, Superintendent Jason Hutson, Joseph Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Booher et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Marvin Banks, Running River, Dale Arnold and others
Defendant:
Superintendent Bradley Booher, Head Chaplain Henry Hansard, Tracy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARDNER v. FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01181
Plaintiff:
CRAIG JERMAINE GARDNER
Defendant:
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUDICIAL CHAMBERS, JUSTICE JUANITA KIDD STOUT CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holtzinger v. Rowe
as 1:2024cv00788
Petitioner:
Patrick Landon Holtzinger
Respondent:
Major Craig Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wimberly v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Craig Ervin Wimberly
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, C. Herman, J. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson, Craig v. Lane, Benjamin et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Craig Darnell McPherson
Defendant:
Benjamin Lane, Ryan Boie, Fran Rivord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Milam v. USA
as 6:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Craig Mitchell Milam
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Floyd v. Secretary Department of Corrections
as 5:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Craig Floyd
Respondent:
Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Braden Shafer v. United States
as 24-1450
Petitioner:
Braden Craig Shafer
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
