Cases 51 - 60 of 389
BOATRIGHT v. DOBBS
as 1:2022cv01685
Petitioner:
JOHN BOATRIGHT
Respondent:
DOBBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dobbs v. Morrisey O'Donnell et al
as 3:2022cv01224
Plaintiff:
Timothy John Dobbs
Defendant:
Sheriff Nicole Morrisey O'Donnell and Derrick Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Prigmore v. FCI Beaumont Staff
as 5:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
William Prigmore
Defendant:
FCI Beaumont Staff, Warden Bryan K. Dobbs, Multiple Unknown Agents of the BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dobbs v. Noll et al
as 5:2022cv03163
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Avery Dobbs
Defendant:
Jesse Noll and Veronica Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Molina v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv22487
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Alfonso Molina
Defendant:
B. Dobbs, R. Cutlip, Peter Hanna and others
Dobbs v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2022cv03162
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Avery Dobbs
Defendant:
State of Kansas, Atchison County Sheriff's Department, Jesse Noll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lavares Watkins v. Bryan K. Dobbs
as 22-5632
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAVARES DETROEN WATKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, Warden and BRYAN K. DOBBS, Warden
Dobbs v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2022cv50258
Plaintiff:
John C. Dobbs
Defendant:
Gonzales, J. Leonowicz, Stuer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drywater v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Dusty A Drywater
Defendant:
FNU Dobbs, FNU Brown and FNU Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
