Cases 51 - 60 of 1,617
Hawkins v. Kirby et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins, John A Hawkins-El and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
Kate Mayes, Kirby, Shaw and others
Not Yet Classified:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lungaho v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Mujera Benjamin Lungaho
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Dane Barnum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv03831
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stephen Williams
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Terrell Backes, Cheri Grott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Hamby et al
as 1:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
Josh Hamby and Big Spring Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Putney v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Stedrick L Putney, Sr
Defendant:
Quincey M Ross, Tim Leonard, Tad Huntsman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerly v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Defendant:
State of Idaho, OC Josh Tewalt, Brett Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Josh Pompey v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1048
Plaintiff:
JOSH POMPEY
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
MALDONADO v. EMMONS et al
as 5:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
PABLO F MALDONADO
Defendant:
WARDEN EMMONS, MAJOR JOHN DOE, OFFICER ALFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beal v. Wynch
as 2:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Steve Beal
Defendant:
Josh Wynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mary v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Sharon Mary
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
