Cases 51 - 60 of 3,011
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03322
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Governor Roy Cooper, Todd E. Ishee, Stephen Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClure v. Mac Sim Detention Center et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Nathan Warren Fisk McClure
Defendant:
Officer Noland, Officer Williams, Officer Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv02167
Petitioner:
DALLAS JONES
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mandell v. Linn County Court
as 6:2023cv01751
Petitioner:
Donald Lee Mandell and Kyle D Knight
Respondent:
Linn County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawrence v. Judge Suskauer et al
as 9:2023cv81480
Plaintiff:
Gerald Edward Lawrence
Defendant:
Judge Suskauer, Intake Officer, Knight Security Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHT v. WALTON COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2023cv00117
Petitioner:
TERESA KNIGHT
Respondent:
WALTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. USA
as 1:2023cv02378
Petitioner:
Delores L. Knight
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Knight v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02247
Plaintiff:
Alaina Lenuta Knight
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDMONDS v. KNIGHT
as 2:2023cv01953
Plaintiff:
MRS. MELISSA EDMONDS
Defendant:
FELIESHA KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Greene et al
as 1:2023cv15664
Petitioner:
Loniel Knight
Respondent:
Brittany Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
