Cases 51 - 60 of 16,311
Beatty v. Kennedy
as 1:2024cv11284
Petitioner:
Joseph W Beatty
Respondent:
Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rouse v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2024ct03115
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lindell Rouse
Defendant:
John Godfrey, Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Stephens
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Baker
Defendant:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Reynolds
as 2:2024cv02368
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baumgardner v. Idaho Department of Correction
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Baumgardner
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Watson v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dale William Watson
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rolle, Stephen v. Fabien et al
as 1:2024cv21869
Plaintiff:
Stephen Rolle
Defendant:
Jeffrey Fabien, J. Schaefer, Xavier Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hemminger v. Nelson et al
as 2:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Hemminger, Jr
Defendant:
Paul Nelson, Paulette Storie, Sherry Kness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Grill et al
as 2:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Jacob Stephen Davis and Baylee Samuel Farrell
Defendant:
Steven Grill, Shawn Wead, Jody Bradley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Cherri et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
Sargeant Cherri, Sargeant Ceazar, Sargeant L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
