Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 72,489
Burke v. Masters
as 24-20277
Plaintiff: Andrew Burke
Defendant: Deputy Benjamin Masters, Deputy Guillermo Vargas-Perez, Deputy Augustine Barron and others
Kennedy v. Williams
as 2:2024cv00391
Plaintiff: Daniel Kennedy
Defendant: Cpl Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruhl v. Williams
as 24-3084
Petitioner: TYLER A. RUHL
Respondent: TOMMY WILLIAMS
(PC) Arguilez v. Cuevas et al
as 2:2024cv01730
Plaintiff: Dorel Arguilez
Defendant: D. Cuevas, Ionic, G. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Marable, Jr. v. Mecklenburg Circuit Court
as 24-6591
Petitioner: WILLIAM I. MARABLE, JR.
Respondent: MECKLENBURG CIRCUIT COURT and VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Schaffer v. Hudgens et al
as 3:2024cv00741
Plaintiff: Harold Schaffer
Defendant: Caleb Hudgens, Steven White, Madison Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORR. et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff: JARED MALACHI HENSON
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORR., STEVEN JACKSON, LISA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercer v. Medical Contract USP-Canaan Health Services Department et al
as 1:2024cv01001
Plaintiff: William Mercer
Defendant: Medical Contract USP-Canaan Health Services Department, Mr. Symatin, Ms. Davitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bellamy (ID 53454) v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv03102
Plaintiff: Ronnie Allen Bellamy, Jr.
Defendant: Aramark Corporation, (fnu) Zmuda, (fnu) Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. AULD et al
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff: JAY WILLIAMS
Defendant: MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?