Cases 81 - 90 of 4,063
Rios v. Cummings et al
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Sam R. Cummings and D. Gordont Bryant, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Leon Allen Bryant
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Detention Staff and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bleach v. Puhala et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Defendant:
Emily Puhala, Emily Thomas, Larry Chisholm and others
Plaintiff:
Earnest Bleach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Atwood et al
as 6:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jerome Dixon
Defendant:
Devra Atwood, Jenny Saunders, Melissa Darter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Lumpkin
as 24-20004
Petitioner:
Bryant Christopher Watts
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Schuh v. Burgum et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2023hc02284
Petitioner:
Bryant C Tucker
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
