Cases 81 - 90 of 3,895
HAFNER v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, MATTHEW J. PLATKIN and TAHESHA WAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmody v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024mc00002
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. Carmody
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Frank Strada, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Begay v. USA
as 3:2024cv08000
Petitioner:
Murphy Alex Begay
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wilson v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv04066
Plaintiff:
Blake Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Wills, Lewey, Lt. Royster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) TerVeer v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv03048
Plaintiff:
Justin Ryan TerVeer
Defendant:
Gena Jones, Howard E. Moseley, Brunner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fred Murphy v. Mike Slagle
as 23-7303
Petitioner:
FRED MURPHY
Respondent:
MIKE SLAGLE, Warden and JOSHUA STEIN
RUBENSTEIN v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2023cv05134
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN M. RUBENSTEIN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC, KAREN MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy et al v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02116
Plaintiff:
David Murphy, Benjamin Mathis and Ashley Capiga
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, C.O. Donnaly, C.O. Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Murphy et al
as 3:2023cv01638
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moore
Defendant:
Jerall Murphy, Jackson, Jesus Guadarrama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIST v. MCGANN et al
as 1:2023cv23217
Plaintiff:
DARRELL F. GIST
Defendant:
STEPHANIE MCGANN, ABIGAIL LOPEZ, MR. MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
