Cases 1 - 10 of 514
Davis v. Zook et al
as 7:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Darren Nathaniel Davis
Defendant:
Warden David Zook, Assistant Warden J. Willington, Director Chadwick S. Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANCH v. DILLARD et al
as 2:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
WERDELL BRANCH
Defendant:
C/O. DILLARD and C/O. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Marshall
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Edward Ray Dillard
Defendant:
Steven Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dillard v. Etherly et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Aaron T Dillard
Defendant:
Marcus Etherly, Kenyon Randle and Monicka Branscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Etherly et al
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Aaron T Dillard
Defendant:
Marcus Etherly, Kenyon Randle and Monicka Branscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Anthony Samuel Dillard
Defendant:
Collado Scarborough, Sarah Angol, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Gonzalez
as 24-20163
Plaintiff:
Martin Pena, Jr.
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Sheriff of Harris County and Joshua Dillard, Jailer/ Public Servant
Dillard v. Cozby et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Dillard
Defendant:
FNU Cozby, FNU Merchant and FNU Turnbow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Dept. of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Dept of Correction, Wilson, Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Akinode et al
as 6:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Dillard
Defendant:
Sergeants Oluyemi Akinode, Daniel B. Manyango, Obadina S. Omoaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
