Cases 1 - 10 of 28
John Wright v. Granville County
as 24-1389
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. WRIGHT, Administrator of the Estate of Chad E. Price
Defendant:
GRANVILLE COUNTY, SHERIFF BRINDELL B. WILKINS, JR., CHARLES ROYSTER NOBLIN, JR. and others
Bell v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2024xc00311
Petitioner:
David Lamont Bell
Respondent:
Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Baskin v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
David Lamont Baskin
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Holland v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2022cv00563
Plaintiff:
David Lamont Holland
Defendant:
M Gutierrez, Muhammad Zantout, Unknown Marlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
David Brown v. Raybon Johnson
as 22-55925
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID LAMONT BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYBON JOHNSON, Warden
David Lamont Brown v. Raybon Johnson
as 2:2022cv02814
Petitioner:
David Lamont Brown
Respondent:
Raybon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Granville County et al
as 5:2020ct03362
Defendant:
Edward Cash, Steven Hayes, Jr., Charles Royster Noblin, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Admr John H Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
- Wright v. Granville County et al
as 5:2020cv00661
Plaintiff:
Admr John H Wright
Defendant:
Edward Cash, Steven Hayes, Jr., Charles Royster Noblin, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLAND v. KRUEGER et al
as 2:2018cv00352
Plaintiff:
DAVID LAMONT HOLLAND
Defendant:
J.E. KRUEGER, KELLER, FIRST NAME UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conley v. Jerome et al
as 1:2018cv00058
Defendant:
Keith Day Jerome and Stephen Williams
Plaintiff:
David Lamont Conley, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
