Cases 1 - 10 of 1,822
Gulley #177635 v. Miniard et al
as 1:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Dwain Gulley #177635
Defendant:
Gary Miniard, J. Badgerow, M. Oaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albright v. Berkeley County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv03260
Plaintiff:
Lauren Albright
Defendant:
Berkeley County Sheriff's Office, Berkeley County School District, Anthony Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Thompson v. Douglas County Corrections et al
as 8:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Thompson, Sr.
Defendant:
Douglas County Corrections, Michael Myers, Lt. Sanduski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buss v. Melby et al
as 1:2024cv04186
Plaintiff:
Timothy Duane Buss
Defendant:
Eric Melby, John Stephens and Mark Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Daniels et al
as 6:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
David A. Weber
Defendant:
Duane Daniels, District Attorney and Judge FNU Tibby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
David A. Weber
Defendant:
Duane Daniels, District Attorney and Judge FNU Tibby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard #610483 v. Coleman
as 1:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Justin Duane Howard #610483
Defendant:
Rickey J. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, DUAN PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6457
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ezell v. Hamilton
as 24-6085
Petitioner:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Respondent:
COREY DUANE HAMILTON and CASEY HAMILTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
