Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Coleman v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv00676
Petitioner:
Irvin E. Coleman and Lord Divine Allah
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
David Firewalker-Fields v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7769
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID NIGHTHORSE FIREWALKER-FIELDS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, sued Individually and Official Capacity and IVAN GILMORE, Warden
Defendant:
E. WITT, Grievance Coordinator and Ombudsman Sussex I State Prison, sued Individually and Official Capacity, SGT. RIDDICK, Night Sergeant Housing 2 Sussex I State Prison, sued Individually and Official Capacity, ISRAEL HAMILTON, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, sued Individually and Official Capacity and others
Coleman v. Gomez
as 6:2020cv00157
Petitioner:
Charles E. Coleman
Respondent:
C. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02138
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PC) Coleman v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv01811
Plaintiff:
Robert Coleman and Robert E. Coleman
Defendant:
Jeff Sellwood, MacComber, Amirik Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Ramey
as 4:2018cv01750
Petitioner:
Edgar E. Coleman
Respondent:
Eileen Ramey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLEMAN v. HODGES
as 2:2018cv01152
Defendant:
C/O HODGES
Plaintiff:
BLAINE E. COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Coleman v. Virga et al
as 2:2017cv00851
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Coleman
Defendant:
T. Virga, Jeff Macomber, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
