Cases 1 - 10 of 41
(HC) Thomas v. Warden of Folsom State Prison
as 2:2023cv02741
Petitioner:
William H. Thomas and William Henry Thomas
Respondent:
Warden of Folsom State Prison and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RABY et al v. REAVES et al
as 5:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
JODY L RABY and RICKEY H THOMAS
Defendant:
ANGELA REAVES, WEST, HIGHTOWER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Agular et al
as 3:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
William H. Thomas
Defendant:
Agular, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas-El v. Perry et al
as 4:2021cv00557
Defendant:
J Stovall, Austin, B Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon H Thomas-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villafana v. Padrick
as 3:2020cv00028
Defendant:
H. Thomas Padrick, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Jacques Paul Villafana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00417
Defendant:
Sonja Pritchett, Derrick Cunningham and Yvonne Robinson
Plaintiff:
Alonzo H. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villafana v. Padrick, Jr
as 3:2018cv00890
Defendant:
H. Thomas Padrick, Jr
Plaintiff:
Jacques Paul Villafana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Nash et al
as 3:2018cv00585
Defendant:
Dr Anthony Chambers and Warden Cheron Nash
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Arnold H. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Farrow et al v. The County of Cayuga et al
as 9:2018cv00804
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sedore, Kevin Z. Daniels, Rondell D. Farrow, Jr. and others
Defendant:
The County of Cayuga, David Gould and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
as 4:2017cv02164
Petitioner:
Robert H. Thomas
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
