Cases 1 - 10 of 262
Bailey v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
James Robert Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Long v. Garland et al
as 5:2024hc02102
Petitioner:
James Long and James Robert Long
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James Gregg, Jr. v. USA
as 24-11630
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBERT GREGG, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Person v. Strada et al
as 3:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
James Robert Person, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Chet O. Crass, Steve Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaney v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
James Robert Chaney
Defendant:
Branden Davis, Dale Reed, Antonio D Johnson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Garfield Co Court et al
as 5:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
James Robert Blanchard
Defendant:
Garfield Co Court House, Police Station Officers, FNU Haild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv05846
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERTS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELLPATH LLC and HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Clark
as 1:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
James Robert Nelson
Respondent:
Harold Clark and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TICE v. WILSON et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBERT TICE
Respondent:
HARRY E. WILSON and PA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blodgett v. Silver Bow Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
James Robert Blodgett
Defendant:
Silver Bow Detention Center, Mark Johnson, Officer Ray Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
