Cases 1 - 10 of 1,893
Shirley v. USA
as 3:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Jo Shirley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Daniel v. Heredia
as 6:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Dusty Jo Daniel
Defendant:
Deputy Heredia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Defendant:
Abdul Khanzada, Brittany Khanzada, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edgar Holloway v. Kirsten Hunter, et al
as 24-2069
Plaintiff:
Edgar Holloway
Defendant:
Kirsten Hunter, Sharron Robbins, Preston Morgan and others
WILLIAMSON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
TORSHAZO WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MR. BROWN, SAM PAGE, CAPTAIN MS. JENNIFER BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. SALAMON et al
as 2:2024cv02067
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER BROWN
Respondent:
MS. BOBBI JO SALAMON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNYSLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dwight Bowen v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, KERI MOORE and others
Logan Dyjak v. Stacey Horstman, et al
as 24-1675
Plaintiff:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant:
STACEY HORSTMAN, JO-AN LYNN and LANA MILLER
Morrison v. County of Yellowstone et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
James Morrison
Defendant:
County of Yellowstone, Terry Halpin, Emily Jo Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
