Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Richardson v. Flory et al
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Richardson
Defendant:
Nurse Flory, Nurse Mallery, Nurse Leann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Prime Care Employees
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
John J Richardson
Defendant:
Prime Care Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Warden of Dauphin County Prison et al
as 1:2022cv01616
Petitioner:
John Joseph Richardson
Respondent:
Warden of Dauphin County Prison and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Holbrook
as 3:2020cv05178
Petitioner:
John Arthur Richardson
Respondent:
State of Washington and Donald R Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pryor v. Hagler et al
as 2:2019cv00146
Defendant:
Len Hagler, Bryan Earls, Lance Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Rayford Pryor, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pryor v. Hagler et al
as 4:2019cv00367
Defendant:
Lance Perry, Len Hagler, Bryan Earls and others
Plaintiff:
Rayford Pryor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Gilbert et al
as 3:2019cv05525
Defendant:
Shane Evans, Margaret Gilbert, Individual Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff:
John A Richardson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Russell County District Court Judges et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2018cv00813
Plaintiff:
John C. Richardson
Defendant:
Russell County Commissioners, Russell County District Court Judges and Russell County Circuit Court Judges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 1:2016cv01292
Petitioner:
JOHN MARK RICHARDSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Richardson v. Kaloroumakis et al
as 1:2016cv03127
Plaintiff:
John L. Richardson
Defendant:
George Kaloroumakis, Wicomico County Detention Center, Kevin Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
