Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Dextraze v. Marion County et al
as 4:2023cv05177
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Dextraze
Defendant:
Marion County, Marion County Sheriff's Department and State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quevi v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2021cv00514
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, John Wetzel and Kevin Kauffman
Petitioner:
Kevin Richard Quevi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richards v. Warren Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv13224
Defendant:
Warren Police Department and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richards
Hevel #328683 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04866
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Kevin Richard Hevel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Fairchild-Littlefield v. Shaffer et al
as 1:2019cv00660
Defendant:
Kyle Niki Cox Shaffer, Kevin Richard Vienns and Janelle Espinoza
Plaintiff:
Gigi Ariel Fairchild-Littlefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Fairchild-Littlefield v. Shaffer et al
as 1:2019cv00499
Defendant:
Kyle Niki Cox Shaffer, Kevin Richard Vienna and Janelle Espinoza
Plaintiff:
Gigi Fairchild-Littlefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dextraze v. Florence County Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2014cv03912
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richard Dextraze
Defendant:
Florence County Department of Corrections and Officer Eli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIMBERLY v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2013cv01043
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
KEVIN RICHARD KIMBERLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quevi v. Lawler, et al
as 12-3645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN RICHARD QUEVI
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND LAWLER, SUPERINTENDENT SCI HUNTINGDON and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Hall v. US
as 11-2451
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN RICHARD HALL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
