Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Thomas McAdams v. Kim Cargor
as 24-1005
Petitioner: THOMAS C. MCADAMS
Respondent: KIM CARGOR, Warden
Joseph Mays v. Jennifer Saad
as 23-7127
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant / Appellee: JENNIFER SAAD, RICHARD HUDGINS, MS. R. THOMPSON and others
Ruiz v. Arizona, State of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02241
Plaintiff: Angel P Ruiz
Defendant: Arizona, State of, Centurion Health Incorporated, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Friday v. Peters et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv02870
Plaintiff: Cleone Cecelia Friday
Defendant: Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian, Michael Segal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCADAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv04081
Petitioner: JOSEPH MCADAMS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McAdams v. Global Tel Link Corporation
as 3:2023cv03181
Plaintiff: Alexander McAdams
Defendant: Global Tel Link Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAdams v. Yates We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00221
Plaintiff: Marcus McAdams
Defendant: John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Joseph McAdams v. USA
as 22-2988
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH MCADAMS
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MCADAMS v. WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2022cv00247
Petitioner: TREMARCUS RAYVON MCADAMS
Respondent: WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Comfort et al
as 1:2022cv02891
Plaintiff: Billy Ralph Smith, Jr.
Defendant: Michael Comfort, Kevin Billips, Sheriff Neil Warran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?