Cases 1 - 10 of 103
ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, ANDREW COLE, SCHEPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swenson (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv03330
Petitioner:
John Swenson
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Groux v. CA Prison Industry Authority et al
as 2:2023cv02831
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Groux
Defendant:
California Prison Industry Authority, Andrew Texixlert, Dave Swenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swenson v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2023cv02558
Petitioner:
Aaron Morris Swenson
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. Swenson et al
as 2:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
Cedrick Wright
Defendant:
Unknown Swenson, Unknown Miaso, Michael Wicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Schnurr, et al
as 22-3183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DAVID BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL SCHNURR, JEFFREY NEAL PETTIJOHN, TOD E. SWENSON and others
Nation v. Souza et al
as 4:2022cv05004
Petitioner:
Timothy E Nation
Respondent:
Scott Souza, Andrew K Miller and Craig Swenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02606
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Prouty
Defendant:
David N. Miles, Matt Dahl, Derek J. Koecher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swenson v. Hable et al
as 0:2021cv01011
Defendant:
Randy Hanson and Scott Hable
Plaintiff:
Aaron Morris Swenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown (ID 57800) v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2021cv03105
Defendant:
Daniel L. Schnurr, Carmen G. Baynhami, Todd E. Swenson and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
