Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Jones vs. Cooley
as 2:2023cv02430
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jones and Tryone Jones
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Shelby County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2021cv02711
Plaintiff:
David Tyron Jones
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff Department and Shelby Mob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Childress County 100th District Court
as 5:2021cv00190
Petitioner:
Christopher Tyrone Jones
Respondent:
Childress County 100th District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Kilpatrick
as 1:2020cv02406
Petitioner:
Tyrone Jones
Respondent:
Terence Kilpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOODS et al v. BROWN et al
as 2:2019cv00475
Defendant:
ANDREA MASON, RICHARD BROWN, ROCKY PADGETT and others
Plaintiff:
TYRONE JONES and MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Virginia Beach Sheriff's Office (VBSO) et al
as 2:2019cv00392
Defendant:
Yvonne Floyd, Charge Nurse, Mrs. Cartwright, Physician Asst., Virginia Beach Sheriff's Office (VBSO) and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Tyrone Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guillermo Lerma v. Robert Stevens, et al
as 17-10185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUILLERMO MORENO LERMA
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT K. STEVENS, Warden I, TYRONE JONES, Sergeant of Corrections Officer, JENIFER A. MARES, Corrections Officer and others
Jones v. Crittenden County Jail et al
as 4:2016cv00926
Plaintiff:
David Tyron Jones
Defendant:
Crittenden County Jail, Arkansas State Hospital, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ferrick
as 9:2016cv00674
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jones
Defendant:
J.P. Ferrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv00312
Petitioner:
Anthony Tyrone Jones
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
