Cases 91 - 100 of 127
Kay et al v. McGuireWoods LLP
as 2:2011cv00341
Plaintiff:
John F. Kay, Jr. , The Mildred F. Kay Trust , Florence K. Temple and others
Defendant:
McGuireWoods LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAMES C GRAHAM et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65512
Plaintiff:
JAMES C GRAHAM and THELMA GRAHAM
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63844
Plaintiff:
JAMES WIRTIS GRAHAM and MINNIE DAVIS
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Entergy Arkansas Inc
as 1:2011cv00020
Plaintiff:
James A Graham
Defendant:
Entergy Arkansas Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Dupree v. City of Phenix City, Alabama et al
as 3:2010cv00970
Plaintiff:
Danny Lawrence Dupree
Defendant:
City of Phenix City, Alabama, S. Lashley, F. Patrick Loftin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon Pineda, et al v. James Graham, et al
as 10-56756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMON PINEDA and PARMANAND KUMAR
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES R. GRAHAM, Trustee of the James R. Graham Living Trust and SCHROEDER MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Robert Heard v. B. Edenfield, et al
as 10-14802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant - Appellee:
B. AVANT EDENFIELD, W. LEON BARFIELD, JAMES E. GRAHAM and others
Heard v. Edenfield, et al.
as 4:2010cv00207
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
B. Avant Edenfield, W. Leon Barfield, James E. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Keller et al
as 5:2010ct03144
Plaintiff:
James R. Graham
Defendant:
Alvin Keller, Jr., Robert C. Lewis, Marshall Pike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv74862
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. GRAHAM
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
