Cases 101 - 110 of 174
Young v. Dagostino et al
as 9:2015cv01222
Plaintiff:
John Young
Defendant:
Dagostino, Fricki and Anthony Lucca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. O'Charley's, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00921
Plaintiff:
John Young
Defendant:
O'Charley's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Presley v. FBI, et al
as 15-4110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON ARON PRESLEY, AKA Ernest John Young
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BOYD BUNNELL, GENERAL MOTORS and others
Young et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08003
Plaintiff:
Cathy Melinda Young and John Young
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crichlow v. Fischer et al
as 6:2015cv06252
Plaintiff:
Kevin Damion Crichlow
Defendant:
Brian Fischer , Ellen Youssef , .John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States, ex rel et al v. Brown et al
as 8:2015cv01125
Plaintiff:
United States, ex rel, Maryland Business Clergy Partnership, Celestial Concrete Construction and others
Defendant:
Eric Brown, MGM National Harbor, LLC, Whiting - Turner Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 2302
Clifton Hoyt v. John Young, et al
as 15-10291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFTON C. HOYT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN YOUNG, In his individual capacity and RANDOL L. STOUT, In his individual capacity
Jacoby v. Kahala Franchise Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00582
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jacoby
Defendant:
Kahala Franchise Corporation, Elite Dining Group LLC, Premier Dining Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hoyt v Young, et al
as 6:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Clifton C Hoyt
Defendant:
John Young and Randol L Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bair et al v. V2V Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00783
Plaintiff:
Bruce Bair , Kristine Bair , John Young and others
Defendant:
V2V Holdings, LLC , Vertrue, LLC , Adaptive Marketing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
