Cases 101 - 110 of 192
Link v. Bean et al
as 3:2015cv00386
Plaintiff:
Kendall Link
Defendant:
Keith Bean, Sonya Troutt, Michael Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gil v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01709
Defendant:
Det. Patrick Barry, City of New York, John Doe 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Jeramy Gil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00116
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company , Fast Process Services, LLC and Houston Burke
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mitchell v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Teressa Mitchell and Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duyar et al v. Food Safety Net Services LTD
as 3:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Mehmet Duyar , Michael Mitchell , Thelma Hilliard and others
Defendant:
Food Safety Net Services LTD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HOLLAND v. CORIZON CORPORATION et al
as 1:2014cv01442
Defendant:
D. ALLEN, JOHN B. CLARKSON, CORIZON CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. State of New York et al
as 9:2014cv00934
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
State of New York, Thomas LaValley, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meghan Aguilar et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05644
Plaintiff:
Meghan Aguilar, Teddy Amstone, Sang An and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Mitchell v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2014cv00535
Petitioner:
Michael Mitchell
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC)Mitchell v. Deptner et al
as 1:2013cv01062
Plaintiff:
James Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Deptner, Al Varezi, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
