Cases 111 - 120 of 269
Anthony Tatum v. Randall Owens, et al
as 15-3771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Tatum
Defendant - Appellee:
Randall Owens, ACC Investigator II, Gregory Smith, ACC CO I, David Rothenay, ACC CO and others
Smith v. Standard Life Insurance Company et al
as 5:2015cv01126
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith
Defendant:
Standard Life Insurance Company and Carlisle Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bell et al v. Greenville County Sheriffs Office et al
as 6:2015cv03996
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Bell and Gregory Smith
Defendant:
Greenville County Sheriffs Office , Greenville County and Cannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Actavis PLC et al
as 1:2015cv08307
Defendant:
Actavis PLC, Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tatum v. Owens et al
as 2:2015cv04183
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tatum
Defendant:
Randall Owens, Gregory Smith, David Rothenay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cadena et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
as 7:2015cv00272
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A. Cadena and Amanda Garza
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , Lisa Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Canon USA Inc
as 2:2015cv00922
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith
Defendant:
Canon USA Inc , Doe 1, Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIFFORD v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv00613
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GIFFORD
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Arguello et al
as 3:2015cv00196
Defendant:
Tania Arguello, Renee Baker, Michael Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Darin J. Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boney v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv00193
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Gregory Smith
Petitioner:
William D. Boney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
