Cases 111 - 120 of 122
ARNOLD et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
ALFRED J. ARNOLD, IVY D. BAIN, BRENDA BOUTWELL and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Arnold et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2008cv00685
Plaintiff:
Alfred J. Arnold, Ivy D. Bain, Brenda Boutwell and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline plc, Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd., Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Arnold v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008cv14378
Plaintiff:
Georgina J. Arnold
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Arnold v. Allred et al
as 2:2008cv01703
Plaintiff:
Gary J Arnold
Defendant:
Terry L Allred, Jerry L Sternes, Karen Barcklay and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arnold v. Roper
as 4:2008cv01327
Petitioner:
Donald J. Arnold
Respondent:
Don Roper
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wendt v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2008cv12485
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wendt
Defendant:
Craig Hutchinson, Greg Naylor, James Forshee and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
LaFaele v. Arnold et al
as 2:2008cv00958
Plaintiff:
Tovia LaFaele
Defendant:
J Arnold and J.L. Herrera
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arnold et al v. Petland, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv01307
Plaintiff:
Lucinda S. Arnold, Lucinda S. Arnold, Fred J. Arnold and others
Defendant:
Petland, Inc., Hunte Kennel Systems & Animal Care, Inc. and Hunte Delivery Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Handy v. Town of Kingston et al
as 1:2007cv11776
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Handy
Defendant:
Town of Kingston, Michael L. Fuller, Timothy J. Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
