Cases 111 - 120 of 180
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00499
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01058
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
STRAWSER et al v. MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, et al
as 4:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
ELENA AGUAYO, CHRISTY ALLENBAUGH, ANGIE ASTON and others
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STRAWSER et al v. MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, et al
as INS/4:13-cv-00121
Plaintiff:
TERRY STRAWSER , ELENA AGUAYO , CHRISTY ALLENBAUGH and others
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Collins v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2013cv05444
Plaintiff:
Michael J Collins
Defendant:
State of Washington , State of Washington Department of L&I , Maria I Mcbride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Collins v. USA
as 6:2013cv06033
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael D Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Collins v. Alameda County Superior Court
as 3:2013cv01371
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Collins
Defendant:
Alameda County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dupree v. Debourg et al
as 4:2012cv01921
Plaintiff:
Ebony L. Dupree
Defendant:
Miguel A. Debourg , Michael W. Betz , Robert C. Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
