Cases 111 - 120 of 9,226
Wade v. Irving, et al.
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Carla Wade
Defendant:
Antionette Irving and John Doe Defendants 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. U Haul
as 4:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Derrick Wade Smith
Defendant:
U Haul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victora Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt et al v. Clive Davis et al
as 2:2024cv03187
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Clive Davis, Saviii 3rd, The Diamonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guillot v. Wade
as 24-30247
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Wade v. State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Wade
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Department of Mental Health, Kelly Gothard and others
Respondent:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yehuda v. Montgomery County, MD et al
as 8:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Yerayel Yehuda
Defendant:
Montgomery County, MD, Warden Frederick Abello, Bernard Trevine Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Wheeler Walker v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lavon Wheeler Walker
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Wade Damron and Christopher Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wheeler v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lavon Wheeler
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Christopher Carr and Wade Damron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade et al v. Greenville Police Department
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Eric Wade and Yvette Toy
Defendant:
Greenville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. USA
as 4:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Wade, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
