Cases 141 - 150 of 171
Young v. Murphy
as 09-1685
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT MURPHY, Superintendent of Massachusetts Treatment Center
Kareemah Bell-Boston v. John Young Homeless Shelter
as 09-7011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kareemah Bell-Boston
Defendant - Appellee:
John Young Homeless Shelter, The Midnight Staff
BELL-BOSTON v. JOHN YOUNG HOMELESS SHELTER
as 1:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
KAREEMAH BELL-BOSTON
Defendant:
JOHN YOUNG HOMELESS SHELTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
REEVES v. COUNTY COLLEGE OF MORRIS et al
as 2:2008cv05646
Defendant:
COUNTY COLLEGE OF MORRIS, GENE VAN DER TOORN, JOHN YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
ROBIN REEVES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ballinger v. Adams et al
as 2:2008cv01024
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ballinger, IV
Defendant:
Garrett Adams, John Young, Nate Kendrick and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Young v. Presley, et al
as 08-4144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST JOHN YOUNG, AKA Jason Aaron Presley
Defendant - Appellee:
ELVIS A. PRESLEY, LISA PRESLEY, ELVIS PRESLEY, INC. and others
Jones v. Dodd-Henderson et al
as 4:2008cv01114
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Jones
Defendant:
Angie Dodd-Henderson, Cynthia Venerable, John D'Alessandro and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chu et al v. Young et al
as 1:2008cv02960
Plaintiff:
Ti-Yin Chu and Gary Chuang
Defendant:
John Young, Department of City Planning, Waldheim Neighborhood Association, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pryer v. Barbour, et al
as 08-60632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY G. PRYER
Defendant - Appellee:
HALEY BARBOUR, Mississippi Governor, individually and in official capacity, JIM HOOD, Mississippi Attorney General, individually and in official capacity, PAUL S FUNDERBURK, Judge, individually and in official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
