Cases 11 - 20 of 7,400
Riverdale MHP, River Valley Communities v. Hicks
as 1:2024cv02390
Plaintiff:
Riverdale MHP, River Valley Communities
Defendant:
Dashon Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Hicks v. Chief Roy Finner et al
as 4:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
James Edward Hicks
Defendant:
Chief Roy Finner, J. Torres and K9 Dog and Handler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuckert et al v. Hicks
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Michael Stuckert and Renee Stuckert
Defendant:
Wesley Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Hicks v. Van Houten
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Albert Himer Hicks, Jr
Defendant:
Margaret M. Van Houten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
HICKS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
JAMIE HICKS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Hicks
as 0:2024cv03209
Petitioner:
Londell Lashun Alston
Respondent:
Chief John Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Leger v. Safeport Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
jeffrey leger
Defendant:
Safeport Insurance Company, Rick Hicks, Colien Spight and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hicks v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03716
Plaintiff:
Savanah Hicks
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Michael Dugue and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. City of Sedalia, Missouri
as 2:2024cv04080
Plaintiff:
Shelley Hicks
Defendant:
City of Sedalia, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hicks v. Ferguson Enterprises, LLC
as 7:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Donna Hicks
Defendant:
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC doing business as Ferguson Plumbing Supply
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
