Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. The Commerce Insurance Company et al
as 4:2020cv40046
Defendant:
Wendy Burdett, Auto-Owners Insurance Company, The Commerce Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Owners Insurance Company et al
as 3:2020cv08077
Defendant:
Owners Insurance Company and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Bradley Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Young v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv02300
Plaintiff:
Bradley Young
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Director TDCJ
as 9:2016cv00003
Petitioner:
Joshua Bradley Young
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00462
Plaintiff:
Jackson Bradley Young
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Thaler
as 1:2013cv00193
Petitioner:
Joshua Bradley Young
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Young v. El Paso E & P Co L P et al
as 6:2009cv01504
Plaintiff:
Bradley Young
Defendant:
El Paso E & P Co L P and Nabors Drilling U S A L P
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1331 General Maritime/OCSLA
Brown, et al v. Alma, Inc., et al
as 08-3013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG W. BROWN, JAN C. BROWN, DAVID A. ARRIGHI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALMA, INC., a Kansas Corporation, THOMAS C. MOORE, JAMES W. MOORE and others
Brown, et al v. Alma, Inc., et al
as 08-3013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG W. BROWN, JAN C. BROWN, DAVID A. ARRIGHI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALMA, INC., a Kansas Corporation, THOMAS C. MOORE, JAMES W. MOORE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
