Cases 11 - 20 of 241
Curtis Smith et al v. LA County Sheriff Dept. Men Central Jail
as 2:2023cv01870
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith and Jack Thibodeaux
Defendant:
LA County Sheriff Dept. Men Central Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv12173
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith and Juanita Wilson
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Smith #277964 v. Shinn
as 2:2022cv01509
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Zaki Smith and Muhammad Curtis Smith
Defendant:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Warden FCI Texarkana et al
as 5:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Curtis Smith
Respondent:
Warden FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00710
Plaintiff:
John Curtis Smith
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Spencer Downs, James Brazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Mazza et al
as 4:2021cv00080
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith
Defendant:
Kevin Mazza, Hope, Massden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. EISAI, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv15234
Plaintiff:
CURTIS SMITH and PATRICIA SMITH
Defendant:
EISAI, INC. and ARENA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
