Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Carr v. Berryhill
as 7:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
David L. Carr
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
CARR v. NOBLE et al
as 3:2016cv00233
Respondent:
KATHEY ALVEY, N. HUFF, K. KERMAL and others
Petitioner:
DAVID H. CARR
FRA:
ROBERT D. RUGHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Payne v. TACS III, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00466
Plaintiff:
Timothy Payne
Defendant:
TACS III, LLC, David Michael Carr, Midwestern Alliance, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carr v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2016cv01047
Plaintiff:
David Alan Carr
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abrego et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv01131
Plaintiff:
Lee M. Abrego , Fredi M. Acuna , Kelvin Agard and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
David Earl Carr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Murphy v. DVE Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01414
Defendant:
DVE Management Inc, David W Carr and Alan Wallen
Plaintiff:
Shannon Murphy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
New York Life Insurance Company v. Kirkendoll et al
as 5:2015cv06149
Plaintiff:
New York Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Crystal R Kirkendoll, Caleb R Carr, David R Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carr et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv12104
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Carr and David P. Carr, Sr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
