Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Caro v. Spota et al
as 2:2016cv07047
Defendant:
Alexander J. Caro, County of Suffolk, Lauren Doskoez and others
Plaintiff:
Karin Murphy Caro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vickers v. Vickers et al
as 5:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Vickers
Defendant:
Melvin Gene Vickers, Janice Marie Vickers, Mary Ann Vickers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murray et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07921
Plaintiff:
David K. Murray , Eric J. Huber , Greg T. Roesler and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murray et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as MN/0:15-cv-01963
Plaintiff:
David K. Murray , Eric J. Huber , Greg T. Roesler and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Murray et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv01963
Plaintiff:
David K. Murray , Eric J. Huber , Greg T. Roesler and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Richard Laverne Brown , Jacqueline G. Hill , Delphine Murray Williams and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00207
Plaintiff:
David W Murray
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sausalito Craftworks, Inc v. Murray
as 3:2014cv01216
Plaintiff:
Sausalito Craftworks, Inc
Defendant:
David M Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Murray v. Stolle
as 2:2013cv00349
Plaintiff:
David W. Murray
Defendant:
K. Stolle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.