Cases 11 - 20 of 22
PAGE et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
as 1:2019cv00376
Plaintiff:
GLORIA PAGE and EDWARD PAGE
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Assem Abulkhair v. Google LLC, et al
as 18-1584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
GOOGLE LLC, LAWRENCE EDWARD PAGE and SERGEY MIKHAYLOVICH BRIN
ABULKHAIR v. GOOGLE INC. et al
as 2:2017cv07217
Plaintiff:
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant:
GOOGLE INC., LAWRENCE EDWARD PAGE and SERGEY MIKHAYLOVICH BRIM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Lockard v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00936
Plaintiff:
Edward Page Lockard
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lockard v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-20176
Plaintiff:
Edward Page Lockard
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Lockard v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv20176
Plaintiff:
Edward Page Lockard
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Page v. Thaler
as 5:2012cv00694
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
James Edward Page
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weiss v. Pennsylvania State Game Commission et al
as 3:2011cv01495
Plaintiff:
Terrence E Weiss
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Game Commission, Mark Rutkowski and Edward Page
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holder et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv06534
Plaintiff:
Thomas Holder, Thomas Holder, Pamela Diane Page and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Edilov v. Pratt et al
as 1:2008cv00285
Plaintiff:
Magomed Edilov
Defendant:
Judge Charles Pratt, Judge Kenneth Scheibenberger, Philip R Terrill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
