Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Acklin et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00162
Plaintiff:
Robert Vogt, Mario Jackson, Jerry Wilson and others
Defendant:
EMP LSO Holding Corporation and Express Courier International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Taal v. St. Mary's Bank
as 19-1212
Defendant / Appellee:
St. Mary's Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Baboucar B. Taal, United States of America ex rel
BANKS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv00803
Plaintiff:
TERASA MARIE BANKS
214) 744-7590 (fax:
Ben C. Martin
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Acklin et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
Paige Acklin , Steve Acuff , Michael L. Adkison and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BROWN v. BERRY et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
KURTIS LEE BROWN
Defendant:
WALTER BERRY, GAMMAGE, GREGORY C DOZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11968
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Taal v. St. Mary's Bank, et al
as 17-1228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BABOUCAR B. TAAL
Defendant - Appellee:
ST. MARY'S BANK, RONALD COVEY, GREGORY T. ULIASZ, Esq. and others
Interested Party:
JAY M. NIEDERMAN, W. MICHAEL SCANLON, RITA EMERSON LAMONT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wilson v. Banks et al
as 2:2015cv00377
Plaintiff:
Robert Vincent Wilson
Defendant:
Cpl Mary Banks, Karen Coulis and Melissa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Harrison
as 3:2015cv00693
Plaintiff:
Tara Marie Banks
Defendant:
John Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
