Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Ordoyne v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv13597
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nathan Adam Ordoyne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Good, Thomas v. Adams, Nathan et al
as 3:2018cv00461
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Good
Defendant:
Nathan Adams , Greg Cisneros and City of Beloit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Harris County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2017cv01256
Plaintiff:
Nathan Adams
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Flood v. Just Energy Marketing Corp.
as 17-546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Flood, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Abigail Wiltz, Yalontya Simmons and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Just Energy Marketing Corp., Just Energy New York Corp. and Just Energy Group Inc.
Adams v. Montgomery et al
as 4:2016cv00863
Plaintiff:
Andrew Nathan Adams
Defendant:
Jeff Montgomery, Grimes, Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Nathan Smith
as 16-3493
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Nathan Adam Smith
ROSS v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2016cv00297
Defendant:
NATHAN ADAMS, RICK GRAVES and ED MICHAELS
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY ROSS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fable Adams v. E.M.C.F., et al
as 16-60274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FABLE NATHAN ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
O. LITTLE, Employee in Medical Department at EMCF and DOCTOR CARL REDDIX, Managing Supervisor of Health Assurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hebert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
Nathan Adam Hebert, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
