Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 816
Allen v. Peacock TV LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00971
Plaintiff: Michael Allen
Defendant: Peacock TV LLC, Regal Cinemas, Inc, Cinemark Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Jones v. Overtime Sports, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv30029
Plaintiff: Paul Jones
Defendant: Overtime Sports, Inc., Zack Weiner, Slam Media, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01072
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Does v. Presley et al
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff: Does John Does 108-113 and Jane Does 108-109
Defendant: Emmett A Presley, Ted E Suhl doing business as Maxus Inc doing business as Arkansas Counseling Associates Incorporated doing business as Trinity Behavioral Healthcare Systems Inc doing business as Lord's Ranch, Maxus Inc doing business as Lord's Ranch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Does v. Presley et al
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Does Jane Does 101-107 and John Does 101-107
Defendant: Emmett A Presley, Ted E Suhl individually and doing business as Maxus Inc on behalf of Arkansas Counseling Associates Incorporated on behalf of Trinity Behavioral Healthcare Systems Inc on behalf of Lord's Ranch, Maxus Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Does v. Presley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff: Does John Does 17-30 and John Does
Defendant: Emmett A Presley, Ted E Suhl doing business as Maxus Inc doing business as Arkansas Counseling Associates Incorporated doing business as Trinity Behavorial Healthcare Systems Inc doing business as Lords Ranch, Maxus Inc doing business as Lords Ranch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Softketeers, Inc. v. Regal West Corporation, et al.
as 24-451
Plaintiff / Appellant: SOFTKETEERS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: REGAL WEST CORPORATION, VU HO INC., THAI TRAN INC. and others
SHANNON v. SHAFFER et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff: DANTAVIS LAMARCUS SHANNON
Defendant: SHAFFER, REGAL, MCCAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Softketeers, Inc. v. Regal West Corporation, et al.
as 24-150
Plaintiff / Appellee: SOFTKETEERS, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellant: REGAL WEST CORPORATION, a Washington corporation doing business as Regal Logistics Inc, VU HO INC., THAI TRAN INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?