Cases 11 - 20 of 1,089
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Parker et al v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Felisha Parker and Laresha Parker
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James T Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currie et al v. My Fav Electronics, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Paula B. Currie and Megan Finnegan-Ratliff
Defendant:
My Fav Electronics, Inc. doing business as Second Life Mac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Hostetter v. Ratliff
as 4:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
William H Hostetter
Respondent:
Rusty Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ratliff v. Standard Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Mallory D. Ratliff
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Ratliff v. Home Depot Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
James Curtis Ratliff
Defendant:
Home Depot Corporation, Blake Delaune, Cox Cable and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratliff v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Flora A. Ratliff and Joey Ratliff
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Ratliff v. Jerry Ritter Trucking, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jamie Ratliff
Defendant:
Jerry Ritter Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Mendez v. Ratliff
as 5:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Neisi Mendez
Defendant:
Joey Lee Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
