Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,007
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff: Danny Hopper
Defendant: Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5258
Plaintiff: SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant: DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Settle v. Vantell
as 1:2024cv01060
Petitioner: Mike Settle
Defendant: Vince Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Settle
as 24-10207
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Daniel Rey Settle
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant: Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Estate of Matthew Settles et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff: The Estate of Matthew Settles and Brenda Settles
Defendant: County of San Diego, William Gore, Kelly Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
Alaimo v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv00741
Plaintiff: George Alaimo, Jr.
Defendant: NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK US COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Curtis Settle
as 24-4099
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CURTIS SHAWN SETTLE
Settle et al v. PHBC Marketing, LLC
as 8:2024cv00404
Plaintiff: Bruce Settle
Defendant: PHBC Marketing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv05080
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?