Cases 11 - 20 of 39,312
Campbell v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02570
Plaintiff:
Terry Campbell
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Saxton v. Perry
as 4:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Terry Saxton
Defendant:
J. Kevin Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sheila Eyajan v. Andrews and Pontius LLC, et al
as 24-1923
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Defendant:
ANDREWS AND PONTIUS LLC, CAROLYN E. SMITH, DALE C. SMITH and others
Kanautica Zayre-Brown v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
as 24-6477
Plaintiff:
KANAUTICA ZAYRE-BROWN
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, TODD E. ISHEE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, GARY JUNKER, in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction and others
Smith v. Newsome et al
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Lee Smith
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, Kevin Seibert, Hallie Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Himelstieb v. Brandenburg, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
TYLER HIMELSTIEB
Defendant:
BRANDENBURG, Mental Health Clinician and TERRY MARTINEZ, Prison Nurse
Tuten v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Terry Burdette Tuten
Defendant:
Warden, Salyard, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kolodzie v. Penn Entertainment Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Terri Kolodzie
Defendant:
PNK (Lake Charles), LLC d/b/a LAuberge Lake Charles Casino Resort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
