Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Walker v. USA
as 6:2017cv06058
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tamu - Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GARRETT v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv03747
Plaintiff:
TAMU A. GARRETT
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Artis v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Tamu Artis
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ARTIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00941
Plaintiff:
TAMU ARTIS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Beane et al v. Gebrueder Knauf Verwaltungsgesellschaft, KG et al
as 2:2013cv00609
Plaintiff:
Richard Mackie, David Page, Frederick Yorsch and others
Defendant:
Gebrueder Knauf Verwaltungsgesellschaft, KG, Knauf International GMBH, Knauf Insulation GMBH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carter v. Byas et al
as 2:2011cv00635
Plaintiff:
Tamu Latieya Carter
Defendant:
Theresa J Byas, Robin W Carter-Williams, Christine Wember and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2010mc00069
Respondent:
TIMOTHY PAUL ALCORN, PAUL NEJAT ALP, DANIEL BAXTER WANN ALTMAN and others
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Adams et al v Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., et al
as 1:2008oe40153
Plaintiff:
Miranda Adams, Miranda Adams, Miranda Adams and others
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
