Cases 11 - 20 of 432
Thatcher v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Thatcher
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Thatcher v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Christa Amanda Thatcher
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lindahl v. Thatcher
as 3:2024cv05160
Petitioner:
Peter Anton Lindahl
Respondent:
Thatcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jefferson (ID 44578) v. Moore et al
as 5:2023cv03263
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jefferson
Defendant:
Leonard Moore, Austin Merz, Bryan Buchman and others
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Becky Thatcher Designs, Inc. v. Huntington National Bank, The et al
as 1:2023cv01203
Plaintiff:
BECKY THATCHER DESIGNS, INC.
Defendant:
The Huntington National Bank, Dan Galbraith and Huntington National Bank, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Thielman et al v. Kotek et al
as 3:2023cv01639
Plaintiff:
Marc Thielman, Senator Dennis Linthicum, Senator Kim Thatcher and others
Defendant:
Tina Kotek, Lavonne Griffin-Valade and Molly Woon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McMurtry v. Dougherty, et al
as 23-1348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGG PHILIP MCMURTRY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL T. DOUGHERTY, CARLOS RUEDA, JEFF GILLIO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
