Cases 11 - 20 of 2,187
TOBY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv04171
Plaintiff:
DANA TOBY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mackall v. Dymond et al
as 8:2024cv02289
Defendant:
Adam Dymond and Peter T. Aurich
Plaintiff:
Toby R. Mackall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
HUBBARD et al v. THE CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA et al
as 4:2024cv00103
Defendant:
CLAY BLACKBURN, TOBY GERKIN, BRENT THOMPKINS and others
Plaintiff:
SONDRA HUBBARD and SHAYNE HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. L3/Harris Technologies Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00444
Defendant:
L3/Harris Technologies Inc., Judge James Andrew Wynn, Judge Toby Jay Heytens and others
Plaintiff:
Kathy R. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ganzie v. Youngkin et al
as 2:2024cv00460
Defendant:
Lloyd Banks, Governor Glenn Youngkin, Samuel Boone and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ganzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lang v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv04137
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Toby L. Lang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gregory v. Meister et al
as 2:2024cv04125
Defendant:
Ms. Duesing, Raina Martin, A Echols and others
Plaintiff:
Toby Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Tekoa Glover
as 24-6683
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TEKOA T. GLOVER, a/k/a Toby
ESTATE OF AYELET ARNIN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv01974
Plaintiff:
BETZALEL ZVI HAZEN, HARRY BRIAN HAZEN, S.Y.H. and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Antoine v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Toby Lee Antoine
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
