Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00038
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00021
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00018
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Bailey v. Abron et al
as 4:2018cv04202
Plaintiff:
Wayne Bailey
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Dr Stephanie Abron, UTMB Correctional Managed Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00186
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Breeden v. Bailey et al
as 2:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Breeden, Jr
Defendant:
Anthony Wayne Bailey and Rachel Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Earls et al
as 2:2017cv04226
Plaintiff:
Travis Wayne Bailey
Defendant:
Alan Earls, Doug Prudden, Jeffrey Falkenrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chizniak et al v. Certainteed Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv01075
Plaintiff:
Robbie Sheets, Jeffrey Broom, Barbara Chizniak and others
Defendant:
Certainteed Corporation, Saint-Gobain Corporation, Saint-Gobain Corporation doing business as Saint-Gobain North America doing business as Saint-Gobain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bailey et al v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 0:2017cv61696
Plaintiff:
Wayne Bailey and Renee Bailey
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC, Greentree Servicing LLC, Homebanc Mortgage Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
