Cases 11 - 20 of 12,630
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gardner v. Long
as 24-4063
Plaintiff:
EDSON G. GARDNER
Defendant:
WENDI LONG, in her official capacity as Treasurer for Uintah County, Utah
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wendy's Netherlands B.V. v. Levy
as 2:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
Wendy's Netherlands B.V.
Defendant:
Andrew Levy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WAYNE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, GARDENER, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred Cain9 Connections, Inc. v. Booth et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Kindred Cain9 Connections, Inc.
Defendant:
Brooke Booth and Wendy Hasenbalg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Colbert v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Christopher Donnyiel Colbert
Defendant:
John Hamm, Wendy Williams, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Youmans v. Nickolas et al
as 3:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Youmans
Defendant:
Wendy Nickolas, Ms. Lampert, Deborah Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02366
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
