Cases 21 - 30 of 12,809
Bryant v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv02055
Plaintiff:
Brenda Butler Bryant
Defendant:
United States and Wil-lie Cop-e-land
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bryant v. Limestone County, Texas
as 6:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Tometheus Bryant
Defendant:
Limestone County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preudhomme v. Prime Hydration, LLC
as 1:2024cv03568
Plaintiff:
Bryant Preudhomme
Defendant:
Prime Hydration, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv05958
Plaintiff:
TERESA BRYANT
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryant et al v. Rosenberg et al
as 3:2024cv00260
Defendant:
The Arena Group Holdings, Inc., Michael Rosenberg and TheMaven, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Phil Bryant and Deborah Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv01939
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BRYANT, DR. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv01941
Plaintiff:
Jenny A. Bryant
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
